![high sirits 1988 high sirits 1988](https://horrornews.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/High-Spirit-1988-movie-Neil-Jordan-1.jpg)
High sirits 1988 movie#
So, for a movie that in essence has nothing to do with this hallowed day, its narrative hinges on the holiday’s very important happenings. And they even have a term for it: skelping (which oddly has a definition on Urban Dictionary, “John caught Dean skelping a ghost chick in Kentucky.”). Yep, in this cinemaverse, ghosts can kinda-sorta become real and do the deed on October 31.
![high sirits 1988 high sirits 1988](https://dvdcover.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/2016-05-20_573f6ed1c4b86_high_spirits-950x991.jpg)
The climax takes place on All Hallow’s Eve-when the spirits are rife with energy, power, and sexual desire. FYI, Neeson is a beast compared to D’Angelo:Īnd where’s the Halloween, you say? As it turns out, High Spirits is an unintentional Halloween movie. And D’Angelo’s Sharon gets a little hot for Martin the Murderer. Noted guests include the unhappily married couple, Jack (Steve Guttenberg) and Sharon (Beverly D’Angelo)-the latter’s father is actually the one who holds the castle’s bank loan (aka the castle’s fate) the newly single and fun weirdo Miranda (Jennifer Tilly) Brother Tony (Peter Gallagher) who seeks a spiritual epiphany or something more in the form of the aforementioned Miranda and parapsychologist Malcom (Martin Ferrero) and his slightly annoying family.īut things gets twisty when Guttenberg’s Jack gets puppy love eyes for Mary (Daryl Hannah), a ghost killed by her also-dead husband, Martin (Liam Neeson), well over a century ago. And when the patrons get angry and decide to leave, the castle’s real spirits unleash their wrath.
High sirits 1988 series#
As the guests arrive, Peter and his team simulate a series of un-spooktacular happenings. In a last ditch effort to stir up some business, the hotel’s owner, Peter Plunkett (THE Peter O’Toole) declares the place haunted. The story centers on a soon-to-be repossessed Irish castle-turned-hotel. Well, how about something in the weird middle: High Spirits, the 1988 supernatural comedy by Neil Jordan ( The Crying Game). What defines a Halloween movie? Must it ooze haunts and candy from every frame? Or will a casual reference or pumpkin suffice? I'm sure you won't be disappointed.Follow Finding the Halloween in ‘High Spirits’ By Joanna If you want classical drama, watch Hamlet or Otello, but if you want hardy chuckles, watch High Spirits. This is a very funny movie, with a few semi-scary moments, that I can highly recommend to you. Please ignore the critics on this one, folks, they are way off. The pious Peter Gallagher and temptress Jennifer Tilly are terrific in supporting roles as are the remainder of the cast, who are mainly from Dublin's Abbey Theatre, except for Connie Booth (who played the housekeeper Polly Shearman in Fawlty Towers), who is an American. A horny Steve Guttenberg, an unfaithful Beverly D'Angelo, a rapidly decaying Daryl Hannah and a flatulent Liam Neeson give excellent performances. Liz Smith is a thief - she steals just about every scene in which she appears. But Liz Smith is a riot, playing Peter's tipsy, widowed mother who still interacts (read has sexual relations) with her dead husband and communicates with other deceased family members. Peter O'Toole is hilarious as the penny-less, hereditary keeper of the castle who is about to lose it all. The entire cast give an exuberant, high spirited performance (pun intended) which is sure to tickle your funny bone.
![high sirits 1988 high sirits 1988](https://similaires.com/img_fr/movie/thumb/32/6390.jpg)
just a pleasure (albeit a guilty one) of movie entertainment. The fact is, folks, this movie is very entertaining, a real joy, from the story, to the acting, to the sets, to the special effects, etc., etc. While not perfect, it is certainly not the complete waste of time that some of these so-called critics claim it to be. In High Spirits, some critics complained that the plot is thin, flighty and lacks realism?!?! But this is a comedy (and a very good one at that), not a serious theatrical work like as play by Shakespeare or some other artsy-f**tsy piece for the pseudo-intellectual snobs. Often, these critics appear to have never seen the movie they are condemning, or, worst still, are ignoring the cinematography and entertainment value based on their own petty bias. In recent years, many critics seem especially to have hidden agendas, or have an axe to grind, or are pandering to special interest groups, which render their reviews worthless.
![high sirits 1988 high sirits 1988](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/nmYAAOSw1vlhg9Zy/s-l1600.jpg)
Being quickly panned by British critics, and then dissed by their American colleagues, leads me to believe that many critics write negative reviews based on the opinions of others. Reviews of High Spirits by some movie critics are prime proof of the theory that "professional" movie critics often don't what they're talking about. This is just another fine movie ranked far below what it deserves. Reviewed by SpitfireIXB 8 /10 Very Funny and Entertaining Movie